We advise on the decisions
that determine whether
a project closes or stalls.
Two tracks. Project developers who need a bankable structure, not a feasibility deck. Shipowners and operators who need to know what maritime decarbonisation actually costs across their fleet before they commit to a fuel pathway.
Two tracks.
One discipline.
We develop green methanol and ammonia export projects from site selection through FEED-ready design and DFI engagement. The output is a project ready for financing — the numbers survive counterparty scrutiny because they are built from the constraints up, not from the headline down.
- Site selection and resource assessment
- CO₂ supply chain architecture and mass balance
- Bottom-up CAPEX structuring (FEED-stage basis)
- Capital stack design and DSCR modelling
- DFI pre-engagement (AfDB, EIB, KfW, EBRD)
- Offtake structure and CO₂ supply counterparty alignment
- Three-scenario stress testing before any counterparty sees the numbers
FuelEU Maritime GHG intensity limits are in force from 2025 and tighten through 2050. IMO carbon intensity measures are live. CII ratings affect charter values now. We advise shipowners and operators on what compliance costs across their actual fleet and what the fuel pathway decision means for their commercial position.
- Fleet exposure mapping under FuelEU and CII
- Fuel pathway economics (methanol, ammonia, LNG, biofuel blends)
- Compliance cost modelling across charter scenarios
- Fuel supply chain feasibility (availability, bunkering, pricing)
- Retrofit vs newbuild decision support
- Counterparty introductions to green fuel producers
We start
with the constraints.
-
1
Systems Mapping
Resource, logistics, regulatory, market. All constraints defined before any project thesis is committed to. Most failures originate in assumptions nobody stress-tested at the start.
-
2
Commercial Architecture
Offtake, CO₂ supply, and financing designed as one integrated structure. Not three separate negotiations that produce three separate risk exposures.
-
3
Stress Testing
Market collapse, regulatory shift, supply disruption, CAPEX overrun. All modelled before counterparties ask. The numbers a DFI sees have already been through the downside cases.
-
4
Counterparty Engagement
Introductions to DFIs, offtakers, site authorities, and co-developers, with a substantive project behind the conversation. We work with a small number of clients at any one time for exactly this reason.
The output is designed to be used.
By investors who need bankable numbers. By offtakers who need supply certainty. By DFIs who need to see that the downside cases have been worked through.
We do not produce reports that end with a recommendation to do further study. We produce a defined output — a financeable structure, a fleet compliance position, a project ready for counterparty engagement — and we stand behind the numbers.
We work with a small number of clients and partners at any one time. That is a deliberate constraint, not a capacity limit.
The counterparties
that matter.
Shipping majors, fertiliser producers, and industrial operators who are simultaneously CO₂ generators and fuel buyers. The counterparty the Levante Loop is built around.
Companies navigating FuelEU Maritime and CII with a real fleet and real charter commitments. We advise on what the compliance numbers mean in commercial terms, not in regulatory terms.
AfDB, EIB, KfW, EBRD, and commercial project finance lenders. We prepare the technical and financial case that gets a project from conversation to credit committee.
Development zone operators and national investment authorities along the Atlantic corridor. We bring substantive projects to the conversation — not speculative concepts.